Skip to content

Fix: allow feedparser 6.0.2 to solve issues in Python 3.9#187

Open
apmarshall wants to merge 1 commit into
donnemartin:masterfrom
apmarshall:feedparser-update
Open

Fix: allow feedparser 6.0.2 to solve issues in Python 3.9#187
apmarshall wants to merge 1 commit into
donnemartin:masterfrom
apmarshall:feedparser-update

Conversation

@apmarshall

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Python 3.9 changes the way base64.decodestring works, which results in AttributeErrors in gitsome. Expanding the version range for feedparser to include 6.0.2 solves these issues. Addresses #186

Python 3.9 changes the way `base64.decodestring` works, which results in `AttributeErrors` in gitsome. Expanding the version range for feedparser to include `6.0.2` solves these issues.
@Jimimaku

Jimimaku commented Nov 22, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Python 3.9 ändert die Art und Weiseworks, was zu gitsome führt. Die Erweiterung des Versionsbereichs für Feedparser löst diese Probleme. Adressen#186base64.decodestring``AttributeErrors``6.0.2

@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 53.21%. Comparing base (d7c57ab) to head (868401c).
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #187       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   95.09%   53.21%   -41.89%     
===========================================
  Files          34       86       +52     
  Lines        2119     6585     +4466     
===========================================
+ Hits         2015     3504     +1489     
- Misses        104     3081     +2977     
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants